 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
I guess if availability isn't in question then here are... |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
LitlElvis on June 08, 2014 at 3:13 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 468 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
Difference in top feed rails? posted by Rob260 on June 08, 2014 at 06:59 AM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
my biased opinions of potential WF functionality issues that I first mentioned here.critical parts are stacked like dominos on top of one another. For any hope of rigidity in this system, the injectors must be clamped down and used as a structural part of this arrangement. This forces the injectors into direct metal to metal contact with the plenum adapters which are are in direct contact with the lower plenum (unecessary heat is conducted into the injectors) and also places strain onto the injector body via the clip. Injectors should be allowed to float within the confines of the fuel rail and the plenum bung, not be used as a stressed member. With the plenum adapters being a loose installation, boost pressure acts upon them and the resulting force is transmitted to the injectors increasing the strain placed upon them to maintain system rigidity. The plenum adapters place the point of injection higher than a stock injector, potentially masking the spray pattern of the injectors. You are required to grind your upper plenum for clearance (mine need clearance too, but at least I offer this as a low-cost service - aka "bolt-on friendly").
I am constantly striving to update my products; two recently added changes to my fuel rails are the addition of a fuel temp sensor boss and billet aluminum mounts to replace the phenolic mounts that so many thought were wood.
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
I guess if availability isn't in question then here are... - 
